STRANGE PEACEMAKERS

By Nina Bachkatov

The American intervention in Venezuela has reverberated far beyond Latin America, including in Ukraine, and was the unspoken backdrop to the 6 January gathering in Paris of 35 representatives of the Coalition of the Willing. The sight of Nicolás Maduro in shackles before the world’s cameras was greeted with quiet satisfaction in Kyiv, if only because he had been a Russian ally. Some Ukrainians briefly imagined Vladimir Putin in the Kremlin gripped by the fear that he, too, might one day share Maduro’s fate.

That moment of schadenfreude was short-lived. What if Donald Trump were to send marines not to Moscow but to Kyiv, to depose what he might label an “illegal president” of a “corrupt country” unwilling to accept his grand peace designs?

Continue reading “STRANGE PEACEMAKERS”

Peace Plans for Ukraine – Trump in Majesty

By Nina Bachkatov

From plans to counter-plans, last-minute mini-summits, telephone or video round tables, the salami-slicing diplomacy deployed in the search for an end to the war in Ukraine has quickly shown its limits. One problem is that it involves too many actors with divergent — sometimes contradictory — interests, many keener to appear in the picture than to contribute to a solution. Another is that it lays bare the agony of traditional diplomacy in an age of instant media exposure.

Continue reading “Peace Plans for Ukraine – Trump in Majesty”

No Thanksgiving for Ukraine

By Nina Bachkatov

Thanksgiving has passed. President Donald Trump pardoned two turkeys rather than the traditional one, but his 28-point peace plan — which he intended President Volodymyr Zelensky to sign by the holiday — has met a barrage of criticism and accusations of capitulation to Vladimir Putin. Nonetheless, it has triggered a flurry of diplomatic activity far beyond the four parties directly involved in the search for a settlement — Kyiv, Moscow, Washington and the EU. The plan has been taken seriously further afield, as shown by offers of mediation or safe venues for talks from Turkey, Arab capitals and even Belarus.

Trump’s initiative, reworked into a 19-point document drafted jointly by Ukrainian and US officials, remains at the centre of discussions. It contains two so-called “details” left for “further talks” — an odd label given they concern core issues such as security guarantees for Ukraine and territorial questions. Whatever happens, it will not be resolved tomorrow. In the meantime, the length of the war has reshaped public attitudes, political dynamics and financial calculations. These shifts are reflected in the composition of the negotiating delegations and the distribution of responsibilities among them. Yet in the end, the decisions lie with Trump, Putin and Zelensky.

Continue reading “No Thanksgiving for Ukraine”

Pandora’s Blades: Drones Redefine Security in Europe

By Nina Bachkatov and Romain Constantin

The use of drones has shifted from anecdotal to essential in modern warfare, largely due to the war in Ukraine. No one speaks any more of a “war of another time”, with soldiers in trenches and artillery barrages. Over the course of the conflict, drones have become indispensable on land, at sea, and in the air. They are used for everything from kamikaze strikes and aerial bombardments to delivering supplies, scattering leaflets, conducting reconnaissance, and even engaging in drone-on-drone combat. It has become an industry in its own right, as shown by the increasing number of media reports on the Ukrainian war appearing as frequently in financial pages as in international ones.

From the very first days of the conflict in February 2022, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) began to play a crucial role on the battlefield. The Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2 gained early renown for striking Russian military equipment with remarkable precision. Its success was amplified by video footage captured by the drones themselves—images that quickly became defining visuals of the war and a powerful tool of information warfare.

Continue reading “Pandora’s Blades: Drones Redefine Security in Europe”

The Reality Behind the Summits on Ukraine

By Nina Bachkatov

The recent meeting between President Trump and President Xi was expected, in some quarters, to mark the moment when Washington would pressure Beijing to in turn pressure Moscow into accepting a “just peace” in Ukraine. Instead, it highlighted the limits of that expectation. The two leaders announced only that they would “do something together” on Ukraine. There was no mention of secondary sanctions should China continue to support Russia’s war effort. Taiwan, the other major strategic question in the room, was left untouched.

The encounter was consistent with the broader pattern of Trump’s tour of South and South-East Asia during the ASEAN summit in Malaysia. Trade dominated every bilateral exchange. Trump arrived buoyed by what he characterised as diplomatic success in the Middle East and presided over a symbolic peace agreement between Thailand and Cambodia. He authorised South Korea to build a nuclear submarine. Leaders offered concessions and investment as the price of tariff relief from Washington. Market openings and headline investment pledges into the US replaced any notion of a rules-based trading order.

Continue reading “The Reality Behind the Summits on Ukraine”

A Glut of Summits and a Lack of Substance

By Nina Bachkatov

If summits are a barometer of international relations, August and early September 2025 have been unusually busy. It began in Anchorage on 15 August, when President Trump warmly shook hands with President Putin—without extracting any concessions. The encounter alarmed President Zelensky, who rushed to Washington to set the record straight, backed by European allies keen to assert their weight and prevent another public humiliation of Ukraine’s leader by “Daddy Trump.” There were much flattery and thanks, but little substance.

After that, “historic summits” became a near-daily occurrence, often convened at short notice. There were duos, trios, quartets—an entire diplomatic orchestra—until President Macron called a “hybrid” summit in Paris on 4 September, with Zelensky in attendance. The self-styled “coalition of the  willing” wanted to present its own plan after Trump had challenged them to do so. Hybrid in format (some leaders in person, others by video), it also mixed those with authority to deploy troops with EU officials who lacked such powers. At the last minute, they were joined by Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff.

Continue reading “A Glut of Summits and a Lack of Substance”

Ukraine Grapples with War and Budgetary Strain

By Nina Bachkatov

The fourth Ukraine Recovery Conference, held in Rome on 11 and 12 July, brought together Ukraine’s allies in yet another show of support for Kyiv. President Volodymyr Zelensky, in attendance once again, displayed his now-familiar ability to project optimism in the face of deepening adversity. His appeal focused on increased deliveries of military aid—especially air defence systems—and calls for further sanctions on Russia.

Despite these urgent pleas, the conference—comprising heads of state and government, international organisations, and business leaders—projected a united front committed to “the swift recovery and long-term reconstruction of Ukraine.” Yet such ambition stood in stark contrast to the realities on the ground: the war rages on, and even a ceasefire appears remote.

This particular gathering differed from the string of summits previously held under similar banners. Its context was more alarming: on the battlefield, Russia had launched unprecedented waves of drone and missile attacks on Kyiv and Western Ukraine—regions typically spared the worst. Though civilian casualties remained relatively low, the scale of destruction was vast, and the strain on the population has intensified.

Continue reading “Ukraine Grapples with War and Budgetary Strain”